<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Formatting dates with&#160;Django</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.magpiebrain.com/blog/2005/08/21/formatting-dates-with-django/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.magpiebrain.com/blog/2005/08/21/formatting-dates-with-django/</link>
	<description>Sam Newman's blog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 18:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.magpiebrain.com/blog/2005/08/21/formatting-dates-with-django/#comment-1444</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 18:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.magpiebrain.com/2005/08/21/formatting-dates-with-django/#comment-1444</guid>
		<description>I suppose a lot of designers who've dabbled in PHP will be familiar with that formatting and it'll be easier for them. OTOH it _is_ a bit of a schlepp to be using the two systems side-by-side.

Just a minor note regarding your code example above: In Python's strftime, minutes have the %M directive, not %m (which is for months). Sure it's just a typo but beginners may be confused.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose a lot of designers who&#8217;ve dabbled in <acronym title="Hypertext PreProcessing">PHP</acronym> will be familiar with that formatting and it&#8217;ll be easier for them. OTOH it <em>is</em> a bit of a schlepp to be using the two systems side-by-side.</p>
<p>Just a minor note regarding your code example above: In Python&#8217;s strftime, minutes have the %M directive, not %m (which is for months). Sure it&#8217;s just a typo but beginners may be confused.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.magpiebrain.com/blog/2005/08/21/formatting-dates-with-django/#comment-903</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.magpiebrain.com/2005/08/21/formatting-dates-with-django/#comment-903</guid>
		<description>Don't worry Stephen - I already swear by Joda for time and date handling in Java :-)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry Stephen &#8211; I already swear by Joda for time and date handling in Java :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Colebourne</title>
		<link>http://www.magpiebrain.com/blog/2005/08/21/formatting-dates-with-django/#comment-902</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Colebourne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2005 14:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.magpiebrain.com/2005/08/21/formatting-dates-with-django/#comment-902</guid>
		<description>Yes, these are two different forms of ISO8601 (basic and extended)

PS. if you're interested in Java you may like http://joda-time.sourceforge.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, these are two different forms of ISO8601 (basic and extended)</p>
<p>PS. if you&#8217;re interested in Java you may like <a href="http://joda-time.sourceforge.net"  rel="nofollow">http://joda-time.sourceforge.net</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Newman</title>
		<link>http://www.magpiebrain.com/blog/2005/08/21/formatting-dates-with-django/#comment-901</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2005 22:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.magpiebrain.com/2005/08/21/formatting-dates-with-django/#comment-901</guid>
		<description>Thanks Manuzhai - I tried the c format but of course it didn't work. You should submit a patch!

As for the date thing, I was basing my format on the dates shown in the "hCalendar":http://microformats.org/wiki/hcalendar spec which claim to be ISO8601 (of course it's possible there is some flexibility in the spec).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Manuzhai &#8211; I tried the c format but of course it didn&#8217;t work. You should submit a patch!</p>
<p>As for the date thing, I was basing my format on the dates shown in the <a href="http://microformats.org/wiki/hcalendar" >hCalendar</a> spec which claim to be ISO8601 (of course it&#8217;s possible there is some flexibility in the spec).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manuzhai</title>
		<link>http://www.magpiebrain.com/blog/2005/08/21/formatting-dates-with-django/#comment-900</link>
		<dc:creator>Manuzhai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2005 20:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.magpiebrain.com/2005/08/21/formatting-dates-with-django/#comment-900</guid>
		<description>First of all, I think ISO8601 is supposed to look like this: 2005-08-21T21:50Z.

Second of all, I was the one who sent in the patch to PHP that added the 'c' parameter to it's date() function; it just gets a ISO8601 date. It should probably be added to Django as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I think ISO8601 is supposed to look like this: 2005-08-21T21:50Z.</p>
<p>Second of all, I was the one who sent in the patch to <acronym title="Hypertext PreProcessing">PHP</acronym> that added the &#8216;c&#8217; parameter to it&#8217;s date() function; it just gets a ISO8601 date. It should probably be added to Django as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
