<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consultants, an alternative definition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.magpiebrain.com/2005/10/19/consultants-an-alternative-definition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.magpiebrain.com/2005/10/19/consultants-an-alternative-definition/</link>
	<description>The blog of Sam Newman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 11:10:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klaus</title>
		<link>http://www.magpiebrain.com/2005/10/19/consultants-an-alternative-definition/comment-page-1/#comment-2792</link>
		<dc:creator>Klaus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 10:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.magpiebrain.com/2005/10/19/consultants-an-alternative-definition/#comment-2792</guid>
		<description>For the second sentence, I would suggest a modification as follows, as it depends on what &quot;themselves&quot; means per individual:

&quot;Good consultants find that delicate balance between being CONSULTANTS and not being CONSULTANTS that enable them to get the job done for the client.&quot;

Maybe you did mean that with your word &quot;themselves&quot; as you might implicitely reflected that a consultant is - for himself - a consultant, and not a person with individual (also customer-friendly) attributes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the second sentence, I would suggest a modification as follows, as it depends on what &#8220;themselves&#8221; means per individual:</p>
<p>&#8220;Good consultants find that delicate balance between being CONSULTANTS and not being CONSULTANTS that enable them to get the job done for the client.&#8221;</p>
<p>Maybe you did mean that with your word &#8220;themselves&#8221; as you might implicitely reflected that a consultant is &#8211; for himself &#8211; a consultant, and not a person with individual (also customer-friendly) attributes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damian</title>
		<link>http://www.magpiebrain.com/2005/10/19/consultants-an-alternative-definition/comment-page-1/#comment-2791</link>
		<dc:creator>damian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2005 09:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.magpiebrain.com/2005/10/19/consultants-an-alternative-definition/#comment-2791</guid>
		<description>Spot on!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spot on!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
